Neutral Politics

Verified by 2+ sources. No propaganda.

BreakingPolitics

J&K Assembly passes a resolution asking the Centre to restore statehood

On Monday the Jammu and Kashmir Assembly passed, by voice vote, Chief Minister Omar Abdullah's resolution asking the Centre for immediate restoration of full statehood. The BJP walked out. Deccan Herald reported that eight amendments were withdrawn and the original text was voted. The vote is the Assembly's demand. It does not itself restore statehood.

Neutral Politics DeskUpdated 5 min read

हिंदी में पढ़ें

Also on Instagram: J&K Assembly passes a resolution asking the Centre to restore statehood · Uproar in J&K Assembly Over Statehood Resolution

Photo: Express Photo; via Deccan Herald; Imran Nissar / The Hindu; via Indian Express; via New Indian Express; J&K Legislature Complex (file), Ramchandra9 / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 3.0

The Jammu and Kashmir Legislative Assembly on Monday, 28 September 2026, passed a resolution asking the Centre for the immediate and urgent restoration of full statehood. Chief Minister Omar Abdullah had moved it on Friday, 25 September. Deccan Herald and The Hindu reported a voice vote amid a BJP protest and walkout. Hindustan Times reported a majority after a long debate. Deccan Herald reported that the vote does not itself restore statehood, and that restoration would require action by the Centre.

The text, Deccan Herald reported, also cites House resolutions of 2000 and 2024 and is to be forwarded to the Government of India. The 26 June 2000 resolution, under Farooq Abdullah, sought greater autonomy as before 9 August 1953. The 6 November 2024 resolution sought restoration of special status. The Indian Express reported that the Centre had rejected the 2000 text.

Ten amendments were filed. The Indian Express reported that six National Conference MLAs, among them Baramulla MLA Javid Hassan Baig, sought to add Articles 370 and 35A. Baig's wording was "along with restoration of Article 370 and the constitutional protections formerly available under Article 35A". PDP MLA Waheed Para sought those provisions in their original form, with autonomy. Congress MLA Nizam-ud-din Bhat sought a reminder of commitments. Hindustan Times reported amendments on autonomy and Article 370, and said the passed text refers to autonomy and special status.

Deccan Herald reported that Abdullah asked members not to press the amendments, that eight MLAs withdrew them, and that Speaker Abdul Rahim Rather put the original text to a voice vote. It passed during the BJP protest. The references the papers describe are that original text's mention of 2000 and 2024, and Hindustan Times' description of the passed resolution. The accounts do not say Article 370 or Article 35A is back in force.

The Hindu reported that BJP MLAs entered the well, tore papers and held mock proceedings led by Sham Lal Sharma. Four were marshalled out. Slogans included "Bharat Mata ki Jai" and "Speaker sahib, kursi chodo", The Indian Express and ABP Live reported. BJP MLA R. S. Pathania said 23 MLAs had signed a Rule 215(2) motion to remove the Speaker, and asked him to step aside. Rather said he had not seen it and that it could be listed only after 14 days. Deputy Chief Minister Surinder Kumar Choudhary, also reported as Surinder Chaudhary, asked why the House should wait.

Leader of the Opposition Sunil Sharma said the BJP wants statehood and objects to the wording. A later account of the same sitting says BJP legislators called references tied to earlier autonomy and special-status positions unacceptable and unconstitutional, and that Sharma said the party supports statehood but not that language. The Hindu reported that he called the resolution a violation of the Constitution, said the National Conference wanted to "sabotage" it, and called talk of Article 370 or a double constitution "derogatory". He said statehood was the BJP's agenda. His claim that Amit Shah had expressed displeasure is his account. The resolution remains a demand to the Centre. Statehood has not been restored.

Choudhary asked what had happened to the promise of statehood in Parliament and before the Supreme Court. He also asked, The Indian Express reported, whether a border, which Rajasthan shares too, meant dropping the demand. Minister Sakina Ittoo called the protest "drama for the galleries". Congress leader Nizamuddin accused the BJP of "jingoism", Hindustan Times reported. Those are the members' words.

Deccan Herald reported that Jammu and Kashmir was a state until the 2019 Reorganisation Act created two Union Territories, and that police and public order remain with the Lieutenant Governor. It reported that the Supreme Court in December 2023 upheld the abrogation of Article 370 and said statehood should be restored at the earliest. The House adjourned and is due back on Tuesday.

What's next

The resolution is to be forwarded to the Government of India, Deccan Herald reported. The paper said restoring statehood would require action by the Centre. The Assembly is scheduled to meet on Tuesday. Speaker Rather said the motion to remove him would be listed only after 14 days.

Key facts

  1. Monday, 28 September 2026: the Assembly passed the resolution Omar Abdullah moved on 25 September, calling on the Centre for immediate and urgent restoration of full statehood.
  2. Deccan Herald reported a voice vote after eight MLAs withdrew amendments, while BJP members protested and walked out. Hindustan Times reported a majority vote and said the passed text refers to autonomy and special status.
  3. The text also refers to House resolutions of 26 June 2000 and 6 November 2024. The 2000 text sought greater autonomy as before 9 August 1953. The 2024 text sought restoration of special status.
  4. Ten amendments were moved. National Conference and PDP members sought Articles 370 and 35A or autonomy. Deccan Herald reported that Abdullah asked that they not be pressed and that eight were withdrawn.
  5. BJP MLAs entered the well, tore papers, held mock proceedings and moved a Rule 215(2) motion, signed by 23 MLAs, to remove Speaker Abdul Rahim Rather. He said such a motion is listed only after 14 days.
  6. The BJP says it supports statehood and calls references tied to earlier autonomy and special-status positions unacceptable and unconstitutional. Deccan Herald reported that the vote does not itself restore statehood.

What each side says

National Conference and the treasury benches

Chief Minister Omar Abdullah's resolution asks the Centre for immediate restoration of full statehood and refers to the House resolutions of 2000 and 2024. Deccan Herald reported that he asked members not to press amendments on special status because the Assembly had already passed separate resolutions. Deputy Chief Minister Surinder Kumar Choudhary asked what had happened to the promise of statehood and said Jammu and Kashmir was not the only border region. Minister Sakina Ittoo described the BJP protest as drama for the galleries.

Bharatiya Janata Party

The BJP says it supports restoration of statehood and objects to references to autonomy, Article 370, the pre-1953 position, a double flag or a double constitution. A later account says legislators called references tied to earlier autonomy and special-status positions unacceptable and unconstitutional. Leader of the Opposition Sunil Sharma said the party supports statehood but not that language, and called the resolution a violation of the Constitution. The BJP says 23 MLAs signed a Rule 215(2) motion to remove Speaker Abdul Rahim Rather. He said such a notice is listed only after 14 days. The party walked out before the voice vote.

Not confirmed

  • That the Centre has restored statehood. The Assembly has asked for it. Deccan Herald reported that the resolution does not itself restore statehood, and that restoration would require action by the Centre.
  • That Article 370 or Article 35A is back in force, or that amendments seeking them were adopted. Deccan Herald reported that eight MLAs withdrew those amendments and the original text was voted. Hindustan Times reported that the passed text refers to autonomy and special status.
  • Sunil Sharma's statement that Union Home Minister Amit Shah expressed serious displeasure at talk of Article 370 or pre-1953 status. That is Sharma's account. These reports do not carry a statement from Shah.

Sources

  1. The Indian Express https://indianexpress.com/article/india/jk-assembly-resolution-full-restotation-statehood-article-370-bjp-10897368/ · 2026-09-28 ~14:25–15:01 IST
  2. Hindustan Times https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/jk-assembly-passes-statehood-resolution-with-references-to-autonomy-article-370-bjp-walks-out-101790585048258.html · 2026-09-28 14:16 IST
  3. Deccan Herald https://www.deccanherald.com/india/jammu-and-kashmir/jammu-kashmir-assembly-passes-statehood-resolution-amid-protests-by-bjp-4162366 · 2026-09-28 ~14:34–15:22 IST
  4. The Hindu https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/jammu-and-kashmir/ruckus-in-jk-assembly-over-statehood-resolution/article71518638.ece · 2026-09-28 ~13:25–13:26 IST
  5. The Indian Express https://indianexpress.com/article/india/jammu-kashmir-assembly-statehood-resolution-omar-abdullah-bjp-language-10897034/ · 2026-09-28 11:31 IST
  6. ABP Live https://news.abplive.com/news/india/jammu-kashmir-speaker-impeachment-bjp-moves-motion-over-cm-omar-abdullah-statehood-resolution-1868702 · 2026-09-28 12:06 IST
  7. Times of India https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/jk-assembly-passes-resolution-seeking-urgent-restoration-of-full-statehood-amid-bjp-walkout/articleshow/134537362.cms · 28 Sep 2026, 5:30 AM IST
  8. The New Indian Express https://www.newindianexpress.com/india/2026/Sep/28/ruckus-in-jk-assembly-as-bjp-seeks-speakers-removal-protests-statehood-resolution-with-reference-to-autonomy · 28 Sep 2026, 5:30 AM IST