This note is NP EXPLAINS. The stamp is verified. It was checked at 8:10 am IST on 15 October 2026. It was re-verified at 1:43 pm IST against Hindustan Times, NDTV and Bar & Bench: the quote and the next date were unchanged. The post went up at 1:50 pm IST.
The seat is Sringeri, an assembly constituency in Karnataka. In 2023, T.D. Rajegowda of Congress won it by 201 votes. A recount in May 2026 declared Jeevaraj of the BJP the winner. Deccan Herald and NDTV report that result and that recount. The margin of 201 votes is the 2023 figure in this check.
Rajegowda moved the Supreme Court. He is seeking three records: the video of the 2023 counting, the video of the recount, and the observer report. The Election Commission told the court that the 2023 video could not be traced. That sentence is what the commission told the court, as this check records it. The recount video and the observer report are part of what he has asked for. This note does not fold them into the commission's line about the 2023 video.
The hearing was on Wednesday, 14 October 2026. The bench was Justices Sanjay Kumar and Sanjeev Sachdeva. Bar & Bench, Hindustan Times, Moneycontrol and NDTV report two sentences from the court. "We will not accept these kinds of lame excuses." And: "Whatever you have, produce it on the next date." Those are the court's words in this note. The stamp attributes both lines to those four outlets.
The caption of this check, and the reports of the hearing, read that exchange as an indication. If the records are not produced, the court could draw an adverse inference against the commission. That is how the caption and the reports put the indication. It is not an order already drawn. The next date, when the commission is to produce whatever it has, is 15 February 2027. Bar & Bench and NDTV report that date. The 1:43 pm recheck found the quote and that date unchanged in Hindustan Times, NDTV and Bar & Bench.
Counting records are how a close result can be checked. That is the "why it matters" line of this note. A win by 201 votes, and a later recount that declared the other candidate the winner, is the setting in which Rajegowda has asked for the videos and the observer report.
The cover is a graphic made by Neutral Politics. The India outline is from Natural Earth. The credit is "NP graphic". No photograph is used.
What is verified is the 2023 margin, the May 2026 recount as Deccan Herald and NDTV report it, the three records Rajegowda seeks, the commission's statement that the 2023 video could not be traced, the two sentences from the bench on 14 October, and the next hearing on 15 February 2027. The adverse-inference line stays an indication in the reports and the caption, for the date when the records are due.
Key facts
- NP EXPLAINS. Stamp: verified. Checked at 8:10 am IST on 15 October 2026. Re-verified at 1:43 pm IST: Hindustan Times, NDTV and Bar & Bench, quote and next date unchanged. Posted at 1:50 pm IST.
- Sringeri assembly seat, Karnataka. In 2023 T.D. Rajegowda of Congress won by 201 votes. A recount in May 2026 declared Jeevaraj of the BJP the winner. Deccan Herald and NDTV.
- Rajegowda moved the Supreme Court for the 2023 counting video, the recount video and the observer report. The Election Commission told the court the 2023 video could not be traced.
- Hearing on Wednesday 14 October 2026. Bench: Justices Sanjay Kumar and Sanjeev Sachdeva. "We will not accept these kinds of lame excuses." "Whatever you have, produce it on the next date." Bar & Bench, Hindustan Times, Moneycontrol and NDTV.
- Next hearing: 15 February 2027. Bar & Bench and NDTV. The reports and the caption read the hearing as an indication that the court could draw an adverse inference if the records are not produced.
What each side says
What the court said
It will not accept these kinds of lame excuses. Whatever the commission has, it is to produce on the next date, 15 February 2027.
What the commission told the court
The 2023 counting video could not be traced. That is the commission's account to the court, as this check records it.
Not confirmed
- Any order drawing an adverse inference. The reports and the caption describe an indication, if the records are not produced. The next hearing is 15 February 2027.
- The recount video and the observer report. Rajegowda has sought them. This check's line from the commission is about the 2023 counting video.
Sources
- Bar & Bench — The court on the 2023 Karnataka counting video, and the next date https://www.barandbench.com/news/wont-accept-lame-excuses-produce-it-supreme-court-slams-eci-for-claiming-it-lost-2023-karnataka-vote-counting-video
- Hindustan Times — The court on the 2023 counting video the commission said it could not trace https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/wont-accept-lame-excuses-sc-takes-ec-to-task-over-missing-2023-counting-video-101791977879865.html
- NDTV — The court on the counting footage https://ndtv-india.com/news/national/top-court-pulls-up-poll-body-over-missing-footage-can-t-make-lame-excuses/
- Deccan Herald — Sringeri: the 2023 result, the 2026 recount, and the court's remarks https://www.deccanherald.com/india/wont-accept-lame-excuses-supreme-court-pulls-up-ec-over-missing-2023-counting-video-in-sringeri-case-4182695
- Moneycontrol — The court on the Karnataka video the commission said it could not trace https://www.moneycontrol.com/news/india/supreme-court-pulls-up-eci-over-untraceable-karnataka-recount-video-won-t-accept-these-kinds-of-lame-excuses-14052226.html
